YSS in the Press and Stories of Interest

Improving the Health of California’s Headwater Forests

California’s headwater forests are not thriving under current management practices, and changes are needed to make them more resilient to periodic drought and long-term climate change.  Read the report by the Public Policy Institute of California:  http://www.ppic.org/publication/improving-the-health-of-californias-headwater-forests/?utm_source=ppic&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=epub

Read More

Twenty-five years of managing vegetation in conifer plantations in northern and central California

Read the Forest Service report that includes results, application, principles, and challenges from over 25 years of study.  There are nineteen principles and 10 conclusions resulting from this research program, but more work in the form of 11 challenges is recommended.

https://www.fs.fed.us/psw/publications/documents/psw_gtr231/

Read More

Study Finds Earlier Controlled Burning Limited Severity Of Rim Fire

The findings of a scientific study reviewing the 2013 Rim Fire, conducted by a team from Penn State University, highlight the benefits of controlled burning.  Read the article:  https://www.mymotherlode.com/news/local/338012/study-finds-earlier-controlled-burning-limited-severity-of-rim-fire.html

Read the full study at:  http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ecs2.2019/full

Read More

Deal aims to restore forests, support jobs

Chris Trott, chairman of YSS and managing partner of CT Bioenergy Consultation in Twain Harte, said the agreement will reduce reliance on the Forest Service’s limited budget that’s increasingly being diverted to fighting massive wildfires.  Read the full article in the Union Democrat by using the “Read More” button for the live link.

http://www.uniondemocrat.com/localnews/5871122-151/deal-aims-to-restore-forests-support-jobs

Read More

100 Million Dead Trees: A Danger That Persists Long After the Drought

An aggressive prescribed burning program is needed to manage the massive number of trees killed during the California drought. U.C. Berkeley fire scientist Scott Stephens says there’s limited time to tackle the problem.

WRITTEN BYMatt WeiserPUBLISHED ONREAD TIMEApprox. 7 minutes
THE DROUGHT IN California may be officially over, but that doesn’t mean all the problems are fixed.

One of the biggest lasting problems from the state’s five-year drought is a vast quantity of dead trees. In November the U.S. Forest Service, based on aerial surveys, estimated the drought killed more than 102 million trees on national forests in California, with the greatest concentration in the southern Sierra Nevada. New surveys set to begin in June may raise that number even higher.

The dead trees represent a massive fire risk that could harm nearby communities, habitat, water quality and air quality. Scott Stephens, a U.C. Berkeley professor and an expert on fire ecology, says the only realistic solution is to begin a massive program of controlled burning. This means using intentional practices to restore a natural fire regime to the forests.

California forests evolved to cope with fire. Regular lightning-caused fires created forests that were much more open than they are today. For 100 years our management of forests was misguided: We saw fire as a bad thing, and suppressed every fire. This resulted in forests that grew too thick with small trees, creating a fire risk today that is potentially catastrophic.

We have about five years, Stephens says, to start chipping away at this fire threat before it becomes unmanageable.

Water Deeply: How are forests changing as a result of these tree deaths?

With most of the dead standing trees, there is no plan for removal. That means in about 10 to 15 years, probably 80 percent of them will be on the ground. That’s when, from a fire perspective, at least in areas of high mortality where 25 to 50 percent of the trees have died, having that much biomass on the ground available to burn … that worries me more even than what happens in the next couple years. Since they’ll be dry, they’ll be available to burn in the next wildfire.

Water Deeply: What can we do about it?

Stephens: This is something the Forest Service has been thinking about. If you’re not going to remove these trees mechanically – because you don’t have enough sawmill capacity or roads – one thing you can do when the trees go into the “red phase” is begin new burning to remove some of that fine fuel that’s just accumulated. The red phase is when all the needles and the smallest branches have fallen on the ground and the tree itself is still standing there. So you begin to work by going in there and burning out the understory fuels.

And then as more and bigger material starts coming down from all those dead trees, in 10 years or 15 years, you do it again. You’re taking out the accumulated fuel in layers. Just don’t wait for the whole thing to come down and sit there until the next wildfire comes along and you have a disaster on your hands.

Water Deeply: Have we ever attempted prescribed burning on that scale before?

Stephens: No, we haven’t done it. It’s a challenge. We don’t have a lot of experience with it.

Down in the San Bernardino and San Jacinto mountains, they had a similar mortality event from 1999 to 2002. It looked a lot like what’s happening in the Southern Sierra today. It was a big deal. They did a lot of work down there, spent tens of millions and most of the material was taken down and chipped in place. Some logs were shipped by rail to Northern California to make into wood products.

But I’ve heard of nothing like that going on in the Southern Sierra. So, I think it’s likely the trees will go into natural succession and just fall on the ground. If that’s the case, you have to look at those issues of hazard trees and wildfire potential. A lot of these areas are unroaded and have steep slopes. So the only thing you can use to manage the risk is fire, in some capacity.

Water Deeply: What are some of the challenges involved in doing this much prescribed burning?

Stephens: There’s no doubt funding would be needed to do this, and the work is not going to generate money. I know there’s been some requests by the Forest Service in California for additional funding from USDA to do this type of work. But I don’t know of any outcomes of those requests.

There’s another thing that’s really challenging about doing this at the scale we’re talking about. This is a lot of standing dead material, which is very dangerous. A forester will tell you one of most dangerous things they can do is enter a forest with lots of standing dead trees. More firefighters are killed by falling trees than anything.

 

Water Deeply: You co-authored a study that found prescribed fire actually increases moisture in forests and helps trees survive drought. How does that work?

Stephens: That study focused on a place in Yosemite National Park, about a 45,000-acre [18,210-hectare] area called the Illilouette Creek Basin. Beginning in 1972, the National Park Service began to allow lighting fires to burn there. They allowed maybe 80 percent of the fires to burn without suppression, so fire’s been back in there for 45 years or so. And it really has changed it.

If you go in there today, there’s a lot of forest that is relatively thin, low-density – big trees with lots of space. The Hoover Fire burned in there about 2001, and it burned an area we visited a bunch of times. I remember just being there, walking in that system, and it was a lodgepole pine forest, a pretty place. And after the fire we were walking in 6 inches of water. A wetland got formed. And it was even there last year, after four years of drought. And I thought, this forest has got to be changing.

In the study, we found the amount of water leaving that basin is either unchanged or has increased over time, and the areas around that basin that never had fire going back 45 years, they’ve decreased in moisture. We also know from the paper that the resilience – the ability of that forest to survive drought and insects – is much, much greater. So the tree mortality is much, much lower.

Water Deeply: So, is this what forests might have looked like historically?

Stephens: I think so, yes. We’ve done some statistical analysis based on tree-ring records. The pattern of fire that’s come back to the Illilouette Basin since 1972, compared to the late 1800s – amazingly the regime is almost identical. They did go through 100 years of fire suppression – the Park service was just as good as the Forest Service at putting out fires. So the pattern we see today, the reoccurrence of lighting fire, really was able to sculpt that forest.

Water Deeply: Does that mean we actually have ourselves to blame for all these tree deaths? The drought killed so many trees because we let the forest become too dense?

Stephens: I think you’re right. No doubt the drought was pretty intense. But I think it’s fundamentally a result of the forest structure we have right now. We’re seeing mostly in California a manifestation of unsustainable forest conditions. Not everybody would agree with that. In a condition the forests were probably in 200 years ago – with lower density, larger trees – you get a drought like that and a fire on it and you’re still going to maintain the vast majority of the trees. And today we’re not.

Water Deeply: How do you get people accustomed to this idea that the forests we have today need to change?

Stephens: I do think a lot more people today are at a place where they understand there’s a problem. I think there has been some tide change in terms of people becoming more accustomed to a little bit of burning in the forest.

But if you just talk about the inevitability of what’s going to happen in the future – if we don’t do anything we’re going to have so much more severe fires, more smoke, potential damage to the urban interface and homes. To me there isn’t a no-fire option. You have to maintain the forests as best you can. But it’s not going to be simple. You start small with maybe 10,000 acres [4,050 hectares] of prescribed fire, and maybe in year three you’re burning 400,000 acres [161,875 hectares]. You ramp it up and show people what you can accomplish. I worry much more about the standard fare of just watching what happens if we do nothing. I just can’t support that.

Read More

Supervisor Higgins will stay in D.C.

“I think the highlights were the collaborative work that has gone on with multiple groups including YSS, Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions…”

Jeanne Higgins, the top administrator in charge of the Stanislaus National Forest that covers 42 percent of Tuolumne County and 11 percent of Calaveras County, is moving on from her role as forest supervisor.

Higgins, who has been on temporary assignment at Forest Service headquarters in Washington, D.C., since November, said in an email this week to contacts in Tuolumne County that her temporary assignment will end in a few months, but she will not return to the Stanislaus National Forest.

“I was asked to stay a few more months,” Higgins said Friday in a phone interview, speaking from the nation’s capital. “In the meantime, my husband, Bruce Higgins, he got a promotion to our Washington office and I am planning to follow him and support him. I will not be coming back to the Stanislaus at the beginning of next month as I had expected.”

Bruce Higgins has been employed the past 12 years in a Forest Service enterprise program that allowed him to work remotely from wherever Jeanne Higgins was assigned. In Washington, D.C., Bruce Higgins will be working as a National Environmental Policy Act specialist with the Forest Service, Jeanne Higgins said.

Scott Tangenberg, the acting supervisor for Stanislaus National Forest in Higgins’ absence, will now take over as her interim replacement.

“Scott will remain for short term as acting forest supervisor,” Higgins said Friday.

There is a federal government-wide hiring freeze the past few months as the Trump White House continues its transition, and that freeze is expected to remain in place until at least the end of April, Higgins said.

A Jan. 22 hiring freeze memorandum to heads of executive departments and agencies quotes President Trump stating “the Director of the Office of Personnel Management may grant exemptions from this freeze where those exemptions are otherwise necessary.”

Higgins said she expects the Department of Agriculture and the Forest Service will eventually “outreach to recruit and fill the position” she’s occupied since September 2014.

Arriving in the hotseat

She came to the Stanislaus National Forest in the wake of the devastating Rim Fire, the largest blaze in a century of Sierra Nevada records. Between August and October 2013 it burned an estimated 257,314 acres, including more than 150,000 acres in the Stanislaus National Forest.

Higgins has also seen drought stress and native beetle infestation clamp down and lead to pervasive tree mortality in the central and southern Sierra, including the Stanislaus National Forest. Scientists estimate more than 102 million trees have been killed in the Sierra Nevada since 2010, with 62 million trees killed in 2016 alone.

On Friday, Randy Hanvelt, Tuolumne County’s District 2 supervisor, remembered Higgins as a consensus builder who took time to get to know various groups and individuals, especially people in multi-stakeholder groups that included ranchers, timber interests, conservationists and environmentalists.

“Jeanne changed the game here,” Hanvelt said Friday. “She engaged all the stakeholders. She brought trust to the give-and-take in the wake of the Rim Fire. She always made time to share information. She is going to be sorely missed because she was always a partner.”

When Higgins began working with locals on challenges in the Stanislaus National Forest, she emphasized she believes watershed management is key to future forest health and recovery. Tangenberg said Friday he will strive to continue pursuing what’s best for the forest and the public.

“We’re sad to see Jeanne go, particularly for the excellent leadership she provided for the forest,” Tangenberg said. “We are very pleased with the direction she has placed us on and the great relationships we feel she’s built with the community. I certainly intend to fully maintain those relationships and keep the forest moving in the right direction.”

Higgins said it was a hard decision to remain in D.C. and not return to the Stanislaus National Forest.

“I’m going to miss working with the community,” Higgins said Friday. “I think the highlights were the collaborative work that has gone on with multiple groups including YSS, Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, the Amador Calaveras Consensus Group, the partnerships with TuCARE, CSERC, the Tuolumne River Trust, the county-led tree mortality effort, water infrastructure and watershed restoration work and other informal collaborative groups and efforts.

“I’m hopeful the next supervisor who follows will continue that collaborative work, and I know Scott will in the short term, so I’m hopeful for the future.”

By Guy McCarthy, The Union Democrat, @GuyMcCarthy 

Read More

Mother Lode Coping While Looking Beyond Tree Mortality Disaster

Sonora, CA — Two tour buses full of folks with eyes, ears and minds on the Mother Lode’s tree mortality disaster devoted a day, sharing and learning how to make the forests more resilient to rising bug kills and calamitous wildfire threats.

Themed “Tree Mortality: There Is Hope for the Future,” the recent tour made pit stops near Mi-Wuk Village and Pinecrest, where a roster of experts frankly spoke about the enormity of the growing catastrophe and how various agencies are collaborating to cope with it while working to establish new best practices.

Officials from Tuolumne County, the US Forest Service and CAL Fire as well as the volunteer-led Yosemite Foothills Fire Safe Council were among the participants who spoke; along with managers from Sierra Pacific Industries and PG&E. It was sponsored by the Tuolumne County Alliance for Resources and Environment (TuCARE) and Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions (YSS).

Tuolumne County’s tree mortality task force, aligned with the state-level task force, is one of the leading counties responding to the tree mortality emergency. Its response plan taps state funds and integrates efforts and resources with CAL Fire, PG&E and other utilities such as Tuolumne Utilities District (TUD). Although funding to help private landowners remains a major issue, efforts are in place and a few large-scale tree removals underway in the county, as reported here.

Big Ideas and Cranes At Work

At the initial stop, tour-goers were treated to a demonstration by a PG&E contractor impressively using a master tree climbing crew and a monster crane to mechanically take down dead big trees in a Mi-Wuk Village neighborhood. (To view video of the crew and crane with commentary, click here.) A new program to help low-income and disabled landowners remove hazard trees around their homes was also discussed. (Details and links of this program, called TMAP, are available by clicking here).

Addressing the tour at Mi-wok Ranger District headquarters, Stanislaus National Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins did not pull any punches about how complex managing just shy of 900,000 drought-weakened bark beetle-infested forest acres has become with warming temperatures and increased fire risk. “Large wildfires present huge challenges in terms of response and recovery actions..but this situation that we are facing here in the Sierras is unprecedented…and presents a problem that we cannot solve with our traditional approach.”

Back in June, the US Forest Service reported that an additional 26 million trees have died in California since October 2015 — all in a six-county spread across 760,000 acres in the southern Sierra Nevada region. Adding that to the 40 million trees that died statewide from 2010 to October 2015 brings the estimated dead-tree total to historic die-off numbers that now probably exceed 66 million. Higgins further estimated a current mortality rate of 90 to 95 percent in the pine belt on the south side of the Stanislaus. She said, that since shifting the focus of her department’s work away from Rim Fire recovery to the daunting task of dealing with dead trees, “We have been cutting trees every day since then — close to 30,000 trees on the national forest in the last year.”

Complex Issues, Collaborative Solutions

Setting a tone that continued to echo through the comments of every other speaker for the rest of the day, Higgins stated, “It takes a community to actually respond to this and we need to bring our best thinking to this…everybody is scratching their heads. We need to come up with strategies and tactics that are going to be far different from what we have employed in the past…and also incorporate the use of prescribed fire.” She added that past fire prescriptions, which did not include dealing with drought conditions, are being retooled to address complex challenges both on the ground and with managing risk.

Along for the tour, Jodi Axelson, an entomologist recently hired as a Cooperative Extension specialist at UC-Berkeley, piped up that her department will be developing an extension program to address the infestation issue.

Sharing expertise on dealing with outrageous bark beetle breakouts in British Columbia, she said insecticide injections and anti-aggregation pheromones are more effective in protecting individual trees. For stands with low numbers of beetles just starting to increase in population, Axelson advised, “You can make a dent by cutting down the trees that are still green…when they are full of beetles, even if the crown is green, they are dead — they just don’t know it yet.” She further recommended that an active sanitation program, to remove these trees — along with the visibly dead ones — especially while the beetles are wintering in them, prevents those populations from reemerging in spring. (Click here for more details from her talk.)

While speaking for CAL Fire, Tuolumne-Calaveras Unit Forester Adam Frese highlighted advice and recently streamlined regulations that enable landowners to remove trees on their properties by filling out a one-page form and site map, (detailed here). He called it a credit to the foresters, loggers and local timber industry facilities that there have been very few issues after over a thousand such permitted-projects have been enacted through his unit office. Along with helping remove debris from tree-felling projects Frese said that CAL Fire remains busy doing outreach and inspections to ensure that residents are doing their part to maintain defensible space around their homes. He also credited area fire safe councils for their collaborative efforts in helping fund and execute fuel break projects in fire-sensitive areas such as the one that helped contain the Oak Fire near Sonora last summer, asreported here.

Taking Lessons From History

Onsite at the USFS experimental forest in Pinecrest, ecologist Eric Knapp stood in a clearing on a formerly fire-suppressed forest plot where scientifically determined, variable thinning to a much lower tree percentage, along with debris removal was subsequently followed up with prescribed fire. The result was the creation of a demonstration forest area that was more resilient to drought, wildfire and bug kill. He stressed that fewer trees, more site management and returning fire to its historical role were all key tools that needed to be used together.

Colleague Malcolm North, chiming in, stated experiments across western forests are showing that maintaining spatially variable tree patterns in restored forests are more in line with how they naturally developed; they are also conducive to providing habitat for sensitive species like the spotted owl. USFS silviculturalist Ramiro Rojas dryly opined, after sharing a dire report of nearly complete pine devastation due to tree mortality in the Sierra National Forest where he works, that such strategies should be enacted while there are still trees.

Tuolumne County Supervisor Randy Hanvelt offered his takeaway from the experimental forest that the tree mortality crisis came from forest managers simply not doing enough for too long.

Said Hanvelt: “The trees are healthier here [in the demonstration area] so they are withstanding this bark beetle better than our standard forests, which are the overgrown forests. So it is just a clear answer to me that we really to be need to be doing is upping the pace and scale of everything that we are doing in the forest to thin it, make it look more like it did 100 years ago, and somehow introduce fire back in a judicious fashion…and do mechanical removals where there is a place. The bark beetle kill is a result of not doing enough.”

For speaker highlights from CAL Fire/Frese and USFS/Knapp, along with Hanvelt commentary, click here. To view tour images, click the slideshow link in the upper left image box.

The tour was followed up last Friday by a summit at the Mother Lode Fairgrounds, featuring some of the same speakers. Mother Lode lawmakers Congressman Tom McClintock and Assembly Frank Bigelow were also featured guests, as reported here.

Read More

TREE MORTALITY Bark beetle outbreak may be signal of larger shift

By Alex MacLean, The Union Democrat

Published Oct 7, 2016 at 10:23PM

A century’s worth of total fire suppression that has created unnatural tree density in California forests compounded by increasing global temperatures and prolonged drought periods will lead to big changes for the Sierra Nevada landscape in the coming decades.

Despite current efforts to manage the latest bark beetle outbreak killing millions of trees throughout the state, experts say the beloved pines of the Sierra Nevada may be dominated more by oaks, cedars and other types of trees that are better adapted to survive a drier, warmer climate.

“I know that we’re all attached to the way things look around us, but we need to be prepared for that to change,” said Tom Hofstra, a forestry and natural resources instructor at Columbia College. “There’s really not that much we can do about it at this point.”

Hofstra moderated a panel discussion on the topic Thursday night in the Sonora High School auditorium hosted by the Columbia College Foundation. A summit hosted Friday morning by the Tuolumne County Alliance for Resources and Environment, or TuCARE, also focused on the fallout from the tree mortality epidemic.

Eric Knapp, a research ecologist for the U.S. Forest Service, gave the keynote address at Thursday night’s event. He has conducted research on forest management at the Stanislaus-Tuolumne Experimental Forest that encompasses 1,700 acres near Pinecrest.

Knapp talked about his research in the experimental forest that suggested fire suppression has had a greater influence on forest overcrowding than a lack of logging. He studied three plots that were left untouched since 1929, with some having been previously logged and others not.

The plots in 2008 were two-and-a-half times more dense than they were in 1929, with the density being nearly identical for both historically logged and unlogged plots. Knapp said past logging practices removed more of the larger trees from the plots, making them less diverse and resilient to fires, disease and pestilence.

“It’s kind of remarkable we’ve been able to maintain this density until now,” he said.

In the short-term, Knapp said tree mortality will lead to more biomass on the forest floor that needs to be removed to increase resiliency. He said the long-term goal should be to manage the forests for lower average densities and fuel loads by increasing the pace and scale of treatment through thinning, prescribed fires and managed wildfires.

Other speakers at Thursday’s event were Beverly Bulaon, a Forest Service entomologist, Terry Strange, a biological consultant specializing in wildlife and fisheries, and Lara McNicol, a Columbia College adjunct instructor whose family has owned Browne’s Meadow Ranch for 150 years.

Bulaon said that historic patterns of increased bark beetle activity in California forests closely follow drought periods. Water-stressed trees are more susceptible to infestation by the rice-sized beetles that are native to California.

Although aerial surveys conducted by the Forest Service in May estimated 66 million dead trees across the Sierra Nevada range, Bulaon said she expects that number to increase when results from new surveys are released in the coming weeks.

Other studies have found as many as 888 million trees throughout the state that show signs of measurable water loss in their canopies.

“From a lot of the literature that’s coming out, the drought that we’re having right now is really unprecedented in how little precipitation we’ve been getting,” Bulaon said. “It’s just something the bark beetles are responding to.”

McNicol, who teaches forestry and natural resources at Columbia College, spoke from a personal perspective about the changes she’s witnessed occurring on her family’s land since she was a child and management practices they have employed.

Over the past 10 years, McNicol said the amount of snowfall the property receives each year has declined significantly. Fire suppression over the past five generations has also led to conifers encroaching on the meadows.

McNicol said observations by county residents about the changes are just as valuable as research and studies.

“This is all very important stuff to chronicle,” she said. “We are a part of history. The Sierra Nevada is changing, and we get to be here for that.”

The 15th annual Natural Resources Summit hosted by TuCARE in the Sierra building at the Mother Lode Fairgrounds took a slightly different approach to the topic, focusing more on the effects of the tree mortality crisis and responses by lawmakers, public entities and private interests.

TuCARE is a nonprofit organization based in Sonora that advocates for timber, mining and agricultural interests, conservation and multiple-use policies for natural resources on public lands.

Stanislaus National Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins said the Stanislaus, Sequoia National Forest and Sierra National Forest are three in the state most impacted by the current situation. Aerial surveys have consistently found more and more dead trees over the past three years, from 3.2 million in 2014, to 29 million in 2015, to the current estimate of 66 million.

The Forest Service has felled over 166,000 dead trees across 18,000 acres to date, with 48,000 more acres targeted for work. She said more than 40,000 trees were felled in the Stanislaus National Forest over the past year alone.

Higgins said the current ecological disaster could be viewed as an opportunity to try different strategies.

“Our normal response has been to take the things that have worked well for us in the past and apply it to a problem,” she said. “This problem is not the same as anything we’ve dealt with in the past, so we need find different ways to approach this into the future.”

Rick Carr, regional resource manager for Cal Fire’s southern region, said warmer winters are also contributing to the beetle problem. He said the warmer cycles have lengthened the reproductive cycle of the beetle, allowing them to reproduce up to four times per year instead of two.

Carr displayed a graph showing how mean global temperatures are two degrees higher now than in 1895. The increasing temperatures have also led to fire seasons in California being up to 78 days longer than they were three to four decades ago.

“While only two degrees may not appear significant on any given day, a warming trend has far-reaching consequences to weather patterns, species diversity and resiliency,” he said.

Carr commended the county for being a leader around the state in getting resources on the ground to address public safety concerns from tree mortality. He said the agency is encouraging other counties to model programs based off what Tuolumne has done.

In closing, Carr showed a picture of Lake Arrowhead in San Bernardino County during the midst of a bark beetle epidemic in 2003. Many brown, dead pines surrounded power lines and home along the road.

Carr showed another picture taken this year of the same area and only one pine is still visible, with other types of trees now dominating the landscape.

“The forest is changing,” he said. “It’s not going to be the full, pine-dominated forest, but there will be a forest there.”

The summit also featured speeches from Congressman Tom McClintock, R-Roseville, Assemblyman Frank Bigelow, R-O’Neals, and a panel discussion featuring representatives of Sierra Pacific Industries, the California Biomass Alliance, California Forestry Association and Sierra Nevada Conservancy.

15278638

 

Read More

Forest tour looks at strategies to thin trees, resist wildfires

JOHN HOLLAND jholland@modbee.com

I ambled with a tour group last week across a slope near Pinecrest that had grown thick with trees.

Researchers with the U.S. Forest Service talked about how best to thin these woods so they resist wildfire. The work also could provide logs for sawmills while enhancing wildlife habitat and a watershed that supplies Modesto and other locales.

Forest managers have done thinning for decades, leaving trees more or less evenly spaced across many acres. The project described last week creates much more variety, in patches as small as a quarter-acre. Some are open ground. Some are well-spaced trees. Some are left as thickets for the benefit of wildlife that prefers such habitat.

The researchers said the woods looked like this for millennia because of frequent, gentle fires resulting from lightning or Native American land management. Then came the 20th century and the policy of putting out every fire as soon as possible. The result was a fuel buildup that brought on infernos like the Rim Fire of 2013.

I touched on this research in a story Wednesday that mainly was about bark beetles killing millions of drought-stressed trees. I’m expanding on it in this week’s Farm Beat column because of the connection between Sierra Nevada forests and farming in the Valley below.

Forest thinning could increase runoff by 9 to 16 percent, according to research cited by Steve Brink, vice president for public resources at the California Forestry Association. Less water is taken up by the tree roots, he said, and more makes its way to streams and aquifers.

“Snow-catch is also a big deal,” Brink said, referring to white stuff that can evaporate from the upper limbs. “We want the snow to be on the ground and not in the canopy of the trees.”

The research took place on 27 acres at the Stanislaus-Tuolumne Experimental Forest, used since the 1920s to study logging methods and related topics. Because of fire exclusion, the site went from an average of 127 trees per acre in 1927 to 299 in 2007, ecologist Eric Knapp said.

The project involved intentional burning of some patches when conditions were right, along with logging that produced enough timber to build about 600 typical houses. The Stanislaus National Forest carried out the work with Sierra Resource Management, a company based in Jamestown.

Some of that lumber could supply homebuilders in and near Stanislaus County who are finally coming out of their nearly decade-long slump. And having a more fire-resistant forest could please flatland folks who don’t care to see massive fire scars while visiting Pinecrest Lake or the Dodge Ridge ski area.

The tour included members of Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions, a coalition of environmentalists, timber industry people and others concerned about the national forest and adjacent national park.

Some of the green groups not in the coalition remain skeptical of forest thinning. I spoke by phone this week with Chad Hanson, director of the John Muir Project at the Earth Island Institute, who said large fuel buildups and wildfires like the Rim Fire are part of the natural process.

“They weren’t all low-intensity and small,” he said. “They were also high-intensity and large.”

His group, based at Big Bear Lake in San Bernardino County, argues that many wildlife species benefit from the dead standing trees and downed logs left amid the surviving trees after a blaze. National forest timber sales might require that some of these features be left, but Hanson said it is not enough.

The debate will go on, and I will be happy to travel again to cover it in Tuolumne County, where I used to live and work. It has long been part of The Bee’s coverage area, because so many flatlanders visit there and rely on its water and other resources.

John Holland: 209-578-2385

 

Read More

Rim Fire reforestation plan OK’d three years after blaze

By Alex MacLean / The Union Democrat

Published Aug 18, 2016 at 06:46PM

Three years to the day after the start of the 2013 Rim Fire that charred more than 400 square miles of the Central Sierra Nevada, the U.S. Forest Service officially signed off on a plan to reforest about 10 percent of the burned area.

Stanislaus National Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins signed the record of decision Wednesday afternoon that will allow reforestation work to begin over the next year, the service announced in a press release.

“I am pleased to announce that my decision, based on community input and referred to as the ‘Community Alternative,’ will help create a fire resilient mixed conifer forest that contributes to an ecologically healthy and resilient landscape rich in biodiversity,” Higgins said in a written statement.

The devastating blaze that also destroyed 11 homes was first reported about 3:25 p.m. Aug. 17, 2013, as a small wildfire burning on the south canyon wall of the Clavey River, about five miles west of Lumsden bridge.

Over the next several weeks, the fire became the third-largest in California’s recorded history after burning through 257,000 acres. About 154,000 acres were Forest Service lands.

Maria Benech of the Forest Service, team leader for the Rim Fire reforestation project, said the overall plan covers a total of about 48,000 acres of the burned area.

About 25,000 acres are planned for reforestation, 13,000 acres for thinning of existing plantations that survived the blazed, 5,700 acres for noxious weed eradication, and 3,800 acres for deer habitat enhancement, she said.

The press release and Benech both commended the involvement of Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, a collaborative group that includes loggers, environmentalists and business interests.

Benech said members of YSS participated in all of the workshops and meetings held by the service while developing the plan, providing valuable input that helped create a stronger plan. The group previously helped the Forest Service with a salvage logging plan that was challenged in court by out-of-county environmentalists.

“When we went to court, the judges ruled in our favor because they knew we had a lot of community involvement and support,” she said of how YSS has helped the service through the post-fire recovery process.

John Buckley, one of the leaders of YSS and executive director of the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte, said he and others from his center have spent countless hours over the past several years scouring the Rim Fire area to gain a better understanding of the damage than even the Forest Service itself.

One of the recent observations Buckley has come across over the past year is that many of the trees that survived the initial fire are now dying or dead due to drought and bark beetles, leaving even less hope for those areas to naturally regenerate.

About 35 percent of the Rim Fire area, or more than 90,000 acres, burned at such a high severity that little to nothing survived. Some scientists called the destruction unprecedented at the time, because most large wildfires in the past typically saw 5 to 8 percent of the area burned at high severity.

Buckley said he and the center strongly supported the reforestation plan in order to restore the forest to as close to its previous condition as possible.

“Without reforestation, many of the hot burn areas will simply never be forest in our lifetime,” he said. “They’ll simply be converted into brush fields, weeds, non-native grasses and other plants, rather than being the forests that are so important for water values, tourist values and wildlife.”

One frustration for Buckley and others is the length of time it took to get to this point. Another is the fact that only about 1,100 acres will be reforested over the next year due to prep work and other requirements before planting can begin.

However, Buckley said members of the YSS team are still pleased to see something getting started.

“Our center and the local interests in YSS, which include the timber industry, business interests and others, have all been wanting the Forest Service to get this going,” he said. “We’re grateful and we’re applauding.”

Contact Alex MacLean at amaclean@uniondemocrat.com or (209) 588-4530.

 

Read More

Stanislaus National Forest approves Rim Fire replanting plan

BY JOHN HOLLAND/jholland@modbee.com

The Stanislaus National Forest gave final approval to a plan for replanting part of the Rim Fire acreage.

Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins signed off Wednesday on the plan, which calls for planting conifers on 21,279 acres. It is little changed from a proposal she released for public review in May.

The plan involves just 8 percent of the 257,314 acres affected by the 2013 fire, the largest in the Sierra Nevada’s recorded history. Much of the acreage is in Yosemite National Park, which leaves recovery to natural processes. Some is on private timberland, which already is being reforested. The national forest has areas that it will not plant because it is brushland, has poor access or did not burn severely.

The plan has support from Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, a coalition that includes environmentalists, the timber industry and other business leaders in Tuolumne County. They agreed that it strikes a balance between bringing badly charred areas back to life while protecting soil, wildlife and other resources.

21,279 Acres to be replanted in Stanislaus National Forest portion of Rim Fire

4,031 Acres that will recover naturally as trees drop cones

12,756 Acres of older plantations to be thinned of wildfire fuels

“This effort would not have been possible without the engagement of the community,” Higgins said in a letter to the public. “I commend the collaborative efforts of YSS and others to make this outcome possible.”

The approval came on the third anniversary of the fire’s start near the confluence of the Tuolumne and Clavey rivers. Keith Matthew Emerald of Columbia was accused of building an illegal campfire that caused the blaze. Federal prosecutors dropped the charges after two key witnesses died.

The planting will start in February or March and take three to five years, said Maria Benech, reforestation team leader. Professional crews will do the vast majority of the work, but the forest will set aside some spots for volunteers, she said.

Under the plan, 4,031 acres of less severely burned conifers will be left to reseed naturally through cone drop. Crews will thin another 12,756 acres of older plantations within the burn to help them resist future fires. And 3,833 acres will be managed mainly for oak for the benefit of deer.

John Holland: 209-578-2385

 

Read More