YSS in the Press and Stories of Interest

Rim Fire, Recovery, Progress

By Guy McCarthy, The Union Democrat

In the two years since the Rim Fire broke out deep in a canyon in Tuolumne County, new flowers, shrubs and trees have sprouted in 400 square miles of mountain watershed burned by what became the largest blaze in the recorded history of the Sierra Nevada range.

Woodpeckers, squirrels, deer and other wildlife have returned to some parts of the massive burn, which stretches from the narrow creek bottoms of the Clavey River and the North Fork, Middle Fork, and South Fork Tuolumne River, to ridge after ridge, from Jawbone to Buck Meadows to Yosemite National Park.

Other areas still look like moonscape, scorched or clear-cut to stumps and bare earth, deserted and devoid of life.

Property owners, including ranchers with private holdings that predate the creation of the Forest Service, are still rebuilding.  More than 7,000 acres in the Rim Fire burn in the Stanislaus National Forest have been logged, while thousands of black, dead trees remain.  Debates on how to move forward continue.

Earlier this year, the Rim Fire and its continuing impacts prompted state authorities to select Tuolumne County as California’s sole representative in a national disaster resiliency competition with up to $1 billion at stake.

Who was impacted?

Tens of thousands of nervous Mother Lode residents watched the Rim Fire grow at an explosive rate and continue to burn over the course of two months.  More than 5,000 firefighters fought the blaze.   Families lost homes and outbuildings.

The Forest Service says the Rim Fire burned 257,314 acres, destroyed 11 houses, and 98 outbuildings, leveled several residential camps, caused 10 injuries, and cost $127.3 million to fight.

Near a section of the Stanislaus National Forest known to ranchers as the Jawbone allotment, Stuart Crook and his family are still working to rebuild what’s left of Meyers Ranch, a 500-acre property held by his relatives since 1969.

The Rim Fire tore through the ranch, destroyed a cabin dating to 1886, killed 100 cows and filling in a valuable water source.

“It was an old-time irrigation ditch, open ditch that we had to take of but when the fire came through, it just ruined it,” Crook said.

“All the erosion came and washed it out and the trees, they’d fall over in the stump holes,” Crook said.  “So we had to pipe it – 14,000 feet of pipe we had to put in at high expense to get water to our private property.”

The water will irrigate Lumsden Meadow, above the old cabin that burned, Crook said.

Near a corral, where the wood loading chute burned, Crook showed where his brother Steve Crook has logged out a section of burned trees.  They cleared the land to reforest, and they have yellow pine, cedar and sequoia seedlings taking root.

The Crooks have also put up four miles of fence.  Replacing the old cabin is taking time.

On Wednesday, Matt Divine, Divine Construction of Sonora, brought a load of steel rebar and wood planks to the cabin work site, where excavation has begun for the foundation.  The new building will be 704 square feet, same as the old one.

The Jawbone allotment dates back to 1964, Crook said.  Other allotments go back further.  Homesteaders, ranchers and miners were coming into these mountains decades before the Stanislaus National Forest was created in 1905.

The Crooks and other ranchers wanted to bring cattle up into the Rim Fire burn last year, but the Forest Service didn’t allow it.  This week, Crook point to cows moving along Granite Creek, near Forest Road 3NO1.

“Cows are managing the forest by eating this brush up, but it’s getting way ahead of them, Crook said.  They wouldn’t lete us come up here last year.  The longer they keep the cattle out, the more brush grows up.”

Who started the Rim Fire?

Nearly a year after the blaze broke out, Forest Service investigators said a bowhunter from Columbia name Keith Matthew Emerald, now 33, confessed to accidentally starting the fire while he cooked beans and burned trash at a campsite in a steep drainage near the Clavey River.

Emerald was indicted Aug. 7, 2014, on four counts, including violating a fire restriction order and making false statements.  The chares carried a maximum sentence of 11 years and more than $500,000 in fines.  He pleaded not guilty.

In March this year, Emerald’s defense attorneys said his alleged confession was coerced.

On May 1, federal prosecutors announced they were dropping all charges in part because two key witnesses died in February and March  A friend of Emerald, Tanden Olsen, 34 , of Sonora, died in February 16 days after a workplace accident.  Jerold “Jerry” Bonner, 72, an Alta Helitack Base pilot stationed outside Los Gatos, was found dead of a heart attack inside his barracks.

Emerald could not be located for comment.  Federal defenders who represented Emerald did not return phone messages.  There was no answer this week at the door of a two-story home in Columbia identified as Emerald’s residence by a US Forest Service special agent in a September 2013 search warrant.

What level of threat remains?

One of the easiest ways to understand potential for another massive wildfire is to remember that more than 80 percent of the 898,099-acre Stanislaus National Forest did not burn in the 2013 Rim Fire.

The forest covers 1,403 square miles in Alpine, Calaveras, Tuolumne and Mariposa Counties.  Unburned portions of the Stanislaus National Forest remain just as overcrowded and drought-stricken as portions that burned in 2013.

Another indicator of the threat is that drought-stress and infestation are killing thousands of trees, especially in the Groveland area, where CAL FIRE forester for the Tuolumne-Calaveras Unit estimates 30 percent of the trees are dead or dying.

Weather-related variables watched by fire agencies are equal now to what they were two years ago, Rebecca Garcia of the Stanislaus National Forest told the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors earlier this week.

How did the Rim Fire get so big?

     Rob Laeng, fire management officer for the Stanislaus National Forest is the acting fire chief for the forest.  During the Rim Fire, he was deputy fire chief for the forest.

“The amount of instability in the air, what it did was allow that column to go up to the tens of thousands of feet,” Laeng said.  “It was drawing in oxygen feeding the fire, adding more fuel to it.  It was like a boulder rolling down the hill.  Once gravity started pulling it, the fire just took off.

“The extended drought, the instability of the air mass, the burn indexes, extreme temperatures, low relative humidities, all aligned with where the fire was on the hill and how much room it had to grow and go uphill and inaccessibility of the terrain,” Laeng said.

It was challenge deciding where to safely assign fire crews on the ground, Laeng said.  Less than two months earlier, on June 30, 2013, the Yarnell Hill Fire in Arizona blew up, overran and killed 19 hotshots with the City of Prescott.  It was the worst loss of firefighter lives in a wildland blaze since 1933.  Several of the hotshots killed were California natives, and funerals were held in communities across Southern California.

In addition, fire command staff on the Rim Fire were aware of at least two firefighter fatalities in the same area as the Rim Fire, in 2003 and 1987.  Stone markers in remembrance of them are at the Rim of the World vista, which the 2013 Rim Fire is named for.  Forest Service research also shows two firefighters died in a 1949 blaze on Jawbone Ridge, near the 2013 Rim Fire point of origin.

The Forest Service faced intense criticism for its initial response to the Rim Fire from some residents and a Cal Fire tanker pilot who made retardant drops on Aug. 17, when the blaze was first reported and grew to more than 150 acres.

Some said the early response to the Rim Fire was too passive.  Some questioned why Forest Service tanker planes were diverted to Southern California as the fire grew in size.

Jim Dunn a CAL FIRE tanker pilot  who retired in November 2013 after 24 years in firefighting, said he made retardant drops on the Rim Fire on Aug. 17 for a couple of hours.  Dunn said another tanker pilot based out of Columbia was dispatched, then put on hold as well.

On the third day of the fire, Dunn said he and other pilots made two or three drops before they got put on hold again.

Initial actions report

The Forest Service, aware of the criticism and rumors about how the blaze started, began generating a report detailing its initial actions on the Rim Fire while it was still burning.  The initial actions report was finalized in November 2013.

The report says a lead pilot returning to base from an initial attack assignment on another fire discovered the Rim Fire at 3:25 pm. Aug. 17, 2013.  It was the third fire of the day for Stanislaus National Forest firefighter.  Earlier that day, the Bridge Fire and Boyd Fire had already drawn multiple local resources, including the Stanislaus Hotshot Crew.

A pilot in Helicopter 106, arriving about 4 p.m. flew into Clavey River Canyon near the fire’s origin to look for safe locations to unload crews in the canyon bottom.

The pilot assessed it was not safe to land crews in the canyon due to fire, winds, and topography.  BY 4:30 p.m., four engines, one dozer, two helicopters, two air tankers, and an air attack and lead plane were on the scene.

Factors that convinced fire commander it was too dangerous to send hand crews onto slopes above Clavey River on Aug. 17 included very slow difficult foot travel, the absence of safety zones and escape routes, and rapid fire spread.

That afternoon, five air tankers conducted 31 missions, dropping 32,021 gallons of retardant.

The summary says Stanislaus National Forest fire managers and personnel acted rapidly and added more ground and aviation firefighting resources.

“The initial strategy for containing the fire north of the Tuolumne River was invalidated on August 19 when prolific spotting caused large fire spread on the slopes above and to the south of the Tuolumne River,” the report summary states.

What has been done?

Federal foresters closed portions of the Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite National Park during the Rim Fire Burned Area Emergency Response teams of foresters, botanists, biologists, and other scientists began assessing some areas before the fire was declared contained in October 2013.

Closed areas were expanded and kept closed for more than one year.  A closure order for the Groveland and Mi-Wok ranger districts in the Stanislaus National Forest was lifted in November 2014.

Groups that include representatives for multiple interests, including residents, ranchers, loggers, and multiple agencies, such as Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions and the Tuolumne County Alliance for Resources and Environment, began pressuring the Forest Service for decisive action.

AN immediate concern was how to deal with all the dead and live timber.  Environmental groups from outside Tuolumne County filed lawsuits in September 2014 to prevent logging arguing that cutting down fire-damaged trees threatens spotted owls.

Multiple Rim Fire recovery stakeholders, including Tuolumne County counsel, the American Forest Resource Council and Sierra Pacific Industries, allied with the Forest Service to oppose the legal action.

In May this year, a decision by U.S. Court of Appeals Ninth District judges filed in San Francisco stalled the legal action.  The plaintiffs – the Center for Biological Diversity, the Earth Island Institute and the California Chaparral Institute – can take their appeal higher if they want to.”

The Forest Service has approval to log more than 17,300 acres of the burn inside the Stanislaus National Forest boundaries, according to Barbara Drake, director of the forest’s Rim Fire recovery team.

Logging in the forest’s Rim Fire burn area is expected to continue through Oct. 31, 2016.

Multiple workshops have been held to date on the Forest Service’s reforestation plan.

In June, Stanislaus National Forest staff said the plan’s primary goals include returning a mixed conifer forest to 30,065 acres, restoring old forest for wildlife habitat and connectivity, reducing hazardous fuels for future fire resiliency, and eradicating noxious weeds.

The most recent workshop, in early July, was a step in a process the forest Service must work through with individuals, groups and other members of the public, as well as interested parties known as stakeholders, before the federal agency can move forward with reforestation plan specifics.

Why is the Rim Fire so controversial?

Forest management may be the single most contentious issue in the Mother Lode over the past half-century.  Tensions between residents, ranchers, loggers, hunters, motorsports enthusiasts, environmentalists, and the Forest Service existed decades before the Rim Fire broke out.

Those tensions flare each time there’s a fire.  Finger-pointing is common, but scientists and foresters agree that a century of fire suppression has resulted in overcrowded mountain forests up and down the Sierra Nevada range.

One of the local multi-agency groups, Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions formed in 2010 to bring voices representing diverse interests together to find common ground on public safety concerns and strategies for the drought-stricken Central Sierra Nevada.

To prevent the next catastrophic megafire, some Forest Service researchers, local loggers and environmentalists last month said they agree on the best way forward:  thin overgrown forests with selective logging and more frequent prescribed burns.

“We need to scale up on all treatments,” Eric Knapp, a research ecologist with the U.S. Forest Service, said in late July.  “We are doing 100-acre projects, mechanical thinning and prescribed burns, and we need to ramp it up to 1,000-acre, 10,000-acre projects.”

Knapp and Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions members Mike Albrecht of Sierra Resource Management in Sonora, John Buckley of Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte and Tuolumne County District 2 Supervisor Randy Hanvelt, want more support from other elected leaders, lawmakers, and residents.

Nancy Longmore of CAL FIRE’s Tuolumne-Calaveras Unit urges residents to remember:  there is still plenty of fire fuel in the massive burn area.

“Many people believe that we now have a wonderful fire break east of Sonora, and north of Groveland, and so there’s less need to do their defensible space,” Longmore said earlier this week.  “That’s just not true.  There is a huge amount of flammable vegetation in the burn area.  Millions of dead trees remain, which, in a a few years, will be falling like jackstraws tangled in with the brush that is already several feet high in places.”

 

 

 

Read More

Logging method could reduce Sierra fire losses

By John Holland, The Modesto Bee, July 31, 2015

Timber industry, environmentalists find common ground

Researchers say forests unnaturally dense

Approach could prevent disasters such as Rim Fire

     Pinecrest – people gathered here, about 7 miles from the Rim Fire’s northern boundary, to talk about an approach to logging that could prevent such devastation.

The goal, as with past efforts at forest thinning, is to reduce the number of trees per acre.  The difference here is that the loggers would not just leave an expanse of large, evenly spaced trees, but diversify the landscape with clumps of trees in some spots and openings for grass and brush in others.

The idea has support from a Tuolumne county coalition that includes the timber industry, environmental groups and other partners.  It has moved beyond past conflicts, such as clear-cutting, in support of common goals.

“That is why this is such a winning concept, because it can protect the wildlife and it can provide products,” said Mike Albrecht, an industry forester based near Jamestown.

He talked by phone Tuesday with The Modesto Bee about last week’s gathering at the Stanislaus-Tuolumne Experimental Forest., a 1,705-acre part of the Stanislaus National Forest.  The U.S. Forest Service has done research there since 1922, including recent work on the thinning idea.

Albrecht co-chairs the coalition, which is named Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions because of its interest in both the national forest and the adjacent national park.  The other co-chairman is John Buckley, executive director of the central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte.

“YSS is showing that no matter what side of the political spectrum you are on, there should be strong collaborative agreement to use science to produce more wood products, benefit watersheds and reduce the risk of destructive wildfires,” Buckley said by email.

The field trip included forest researchers, county leaders, aides to state and federal lawmakers, and others.

The Rim Fire, the largest on record in the Sierra Nevada, covered 257,314 acres of the national forest, Yosemite and private timberland in 2013.

Some of the damage was light to moderate, thanks to past thinning, but large areas had over-dense timber that burned fiercely.  The fire created a risk the following winter of soil erosion into Don Pedro Reservoir, a key source of water for Stanislaus County, and it marred places where residents like to camp, hike and fish.

Experts say the dense conditions arose because, about a century ago, land managers started snuffing the frequent, gentle fires that had kept the fuels down for millennia.  Lightning started them as did Native Americans to groom the landscape.  Flames visited some areas as often as every six years, according to researchers.

The beneficial fires can be mimicked by logging, as well as intentional burning when conditions allow.  But a large-sale effort to treat the Sierra has been slow to emerge, in part because of funding and in part because of opposition from some environmentalists.

The recent study at the Experimental Forest sought to refine the thinning methods.  Forest Service researchers Eric Knapp and Malcolm North told the group that the desired condition in a fine-grained mosaic of well-spaced individual trees, clumps of timber, and patches of brush and grass.  Each element could be as little as a quarter-acre.

The study took place on a 27-acre plot mapped in 1929 by Duncan Dunning, an early leader in federal forest research.  The recent researchers found that by 2008, this site had 2.4 times as many trees per acre as 79 years earlier.  It also had less shrub and other habitat for wildlife that does not do so well in dense timber.

Albrecht said the coalition is urging Congress to fund planning for a ramped-up thinning effort, needed on 250,000 to 300,000 of the national forest’s 895,000 acres over many years.  Most of the Stanislaus does not have commercial timber, including the brushy lower reaches and the rocky places above.

The coalition points out that the treatments would pay for themselves through timber sales.  Tuolumne County has two sawmills ready to handle the logs, as well as two power plants that burn wood chips.

Albrecht said the industry generates 600 to 700 jobs in the county now but could top 1,000 if a major effort got underway.

Letting the forest fuel sit would eventually cost much more than the preventive work.  Taxpayers spent $127 million to suppress the Rim Fire, and more costs await with reforestation and other work.

“Forests are going to burn one way or the other, “North said in a summation of the gathering from the coalition.  “We can either manage them to return them as close as possible to the historic, patchy open conditions that made them so resilient to damaging wildfires, or we can expect them to burn more and more often in high-severity fires such as the Rim Fire.”

 

Read More

Disaster Prevention – Local consensus: Thin overgrown forests

Loggers, environmentalists agree on best way to move forward

By Guy McCarthy, Union Democrat, July 25, 2015

Some forest lands in Tuolumne County haven’t burned in a century, leaving them so dense they’re ripe for another disaster like the 2013 Rim Fire.

To prevent the next catastrophic megafire, local loggers and environmentalists have reached an agreement on the best way forward:  thin overgrown forests with selective logging and prescribed burns.

Now they want support from elected leaders, lawmakers and residents.

“We need to scale up on all treatments,” Eric Knapp, a research ecologist with the U.S. Forest Service, said Friday before visiting the Stanislaus- Tuolumne Experimental forest outside Pinecrest.  “We are doing 100-acre projects, mechanical thinning and prescribed burns, and we need to ramp it up to 1,000 acres, 10,000-acre projects.”

During a presentation Friday hosted by Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions, Knapp and Forest Service ecologist Malcolm North outlined what’s working in test sections of the Stanislaus-Tuolumne Experimental Forest.  The collaborative formed in 2010 to bring local voices together to find common ground on the ever-controversial public safety concern of forest management.

Fire history

     Knapp summarized fire history in the Sierra Nevada with information about the experimental forest, first studied by Forester Duncan Dunning in 1929.

“We used chainsaws to cut into stumps to read fire scars, “Knapp said.  The scars helped illustrate a record going back 500 years.  Fires happened every six years or so for centuries, until 1850.

“Then the Gold rush and native American populations who used fire were disrupted,” Knapp said.  “The last major fire here was 1889.”

Photos from the early 1930s by Forester A. Everett Wieslander show what parts of the Stanislaus national Forest looked like 85 years ago, and quoted Forester George Sudworth who said in 1900, “So continuous and widespread are these fires, that except where some natural barrier or chance has prevented, they keep a very large percentage of the seedling growth down.  Dense stands of yellow pine 25 to 50 years old suffer a thinning every time surface fires run through them, and not infrequently the younger stands succumb entirely.”

Forest density has changed dramatically in the absence of fire over the past century, jumping in some cases from 15 trees per acre to 142 trees per acre, a 947 percent increase, Knapp said.

Tree density maps from a century ago and areas of the Stanislaus National Forest in 2008, five years before the Rim Fire burned, showed how overcrowded and prone to catastrophic fires local forest lands are today.

“The Rim Fire showed us we need more prescribed fire on the ground,” Knapp said.

‘Fire is inevitable’

     North talked about the consequences of a century of aggressive fire suppression.

“Suppression only postpones,” North said.  “Fuel loads increase and escaped ignitions occur during extreme weather.”

Dangerous fuel overloading over many decades has set the stage for unnaturally gigantic blazes:  since the start of effective fire suppression in the 1920s, 16 of the 20 largest wildfires in the contiguous U.S. have occurred in the past 14 years, North said.

Historic fire rates in the Sierra Nevada used to burn 487,000 acres a year, North said.  Nowadays, logging, prescribed fires and wildfires consume 87,000 acres a year.

“People talk about the forest getting vaporized,” North said.  “In fact high-severity fire creates large homogeneous, similar-density patches and it perpetuates a high-severity fire forest regime.”

Reducing fuel in the Stanislaus National cannot happen too fast, in North’s view.

“If I could I would get a trained corps of beavers on crack to chew their way through the forest,” North said.  “Think about beavers on crack.”

‘There is consensus’

     Logger mike Albrecht of Sierra Resource management in Sonora, and advocate for the environment John Buckley of Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte, represent some of the diverse voices in Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions.

Albrecht said, “If we dropped a match in there we’d probably lose it all.”

Targeting the goal of thinning the entire Stanislaus National Forest with selective logging and intentional fires is going to take an infusion of cash, resources and commitment.

The Rim Fire burned more the 400 square miles, including portions of the Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite National Park, between August and October 2013.  But more than 80 percent of the Stanislaus Forest did not burn and remains vulnerable to bark beetle infestation, tree mortality, drought, competition for scarce water and megafires, according to the Forest Service.

Albrecht said, “We hope the public will be encouraged that locally the timber wars are over.”

It is important for Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions members and people who support them to stay positive, Buckley said.

“Politicians who spend time lambasting each other are not building that Kum Ba Yah spirit that we already have here,” Buckley said.

Tuolumne County District 2 Supervisor randy Hanvelt said, “I don’t think this is a partisan issue.  I think there is urgency here.  We had the Rim Fire.  We had the King Fire.  Pretty soon the forest could be gone.  I want to emphasize, there is urgency here.”

For more about the Stanislaus-Tuolumne Forest, visit www.fs.fed.us/psw/ef/stanislaus_tuolumne

 

 

Read More

Finding Compromise In Forest Through New Research

B.J. Hansen, MyMotherLode News Director

View the photos at:  http://www.mymotherlode.com/news/local/245156/finding-compromise-on-forest-health-through-new-research.html

Pinecrest, CA — A U.S. Forest Service study is looking to the past in order to find solutions for the future.

Earlier today the non-profit Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions group hosted a tour of the USDA’s Stanislaus Tuolumne Experimental Forest research project.

Situated outside of Pinecrest, the project has been underway since around 2009, and is led by U.S. Forest Service Research Ecologists Eric Knapp and Malcom North. Using a variety of techniques, their goal has been to return a small section the forest to the state it was prior to the 1930’s, before stepped up fire suppression efforts.

It was noted that 100 years ago fires would typically pass through every six years and provided a notable ecological benefit. The move to actively suppress fires created forest land that went untouched for longer periods and became more dense, and ripe for more and larger catastrophic fires.

Mechanical thinning was conducted at the site in 2011, and it was followed up with some prescribed burning in 2013.

Speaking about the project, North says, “Particularly in the context of the Rim Fire, this is a much more resilient system to wildfire. The other big thing we have coming on the horizon is drought. Forests that have been reduced in density like this, which you particularly have openings where the tree roots can move into, and get soil moisture out of, is going to make these systems much more resilient to these types of long-term drought events, that may be more common in the future.”

In striving to create a more diverse ecosystem like was present prior to active fire suppression, the researchers were selective about which trees were removed by mechanical thinning.

North notes, “Some of the trees that are larger in diameter, we know that they would not have been here if we had fire in the system, or at least not in those densities. Particularly we are talking about species that can regenerate under shade but are very sensitive to fire, such as White Fire and Incensed Cedar. Many times some of these trees are 20 inches in diameter or larger. So there’s a perfectly good rational for thinning those trees and getting the economic return.”

Research Ecologist Knapp adds, “We are also looking at the response of small mammals, birds, understory vegetation, and the whole ecosystem. We are trying to find a way of thinning that not only reduces the fuel situation, but also enhances the habitat for the wildlife and other species that we manage.”

There were members of several government agencies on the tour today, in addition to members of the Forest Service. Field representatives were in attendance from Congressmen Tom McClintock and Jeff Denham and Senator Diane Feinstein. Also on hand were Tuolumne County Supervisors John Gray and Randy Hanvelt, and Calaveras County Supervisor Cliff Edson.

The Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions group is co-chaired by Mike Albrecht of Sierra Resource Management and John Buckley of the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center. Both touted how this USDA project is something that competing interests can get behind, and the group hopes the research will help spur a new way of thinking about managing the forest. It is something that could be beneficial to both the ecosystem and taxpayers. While it takes some initial seed money to get these types of projects off the ground, they are eventually offset by revenue from timber sales.

 

 

Read More

Tuolumne County eligible for Rim Fire recovery funds

By Alex MacLean

The Union Democrat, June 18, 2017

California will be eligible for up to $500 million in federal funding later this year for post-Rim Fire projects that would benefit the Tuolumne County area.

County officials received word late Monday afternoon that California was one of 26 states selected by the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban development to move onto the second phase of the national Disaster Resilience Competition, a federal program announced by President Barack Obama last June.

“Now the real work begins,” said Deputy County Administrator Maureen Frank, who is overseeing the local effort to organize projects that would be eligible for funding.

The competition is designed to provide federal funding for areas that experienced a natural disaster in 2011, 2012, or 2013.

Tuolumne County was eligible because of the 2013 Rim Fire that burned more than 400 square miles in the Central Sierra and forced hundreds along Highway 108 to flee their homes.

Though five other California counties experienced a natural disaster in that time frame, Frank said the Governor’s Office told her that Tuolumne was selected for the state’s application due to the size of the Rim Fire, the area’s unmet needs and reputation of collaboration between local groups.

A total of 48 states submitted applications in the competition’s first phase.

The Governor’s Office now must submit a second application to HUD by Oct. 27 that lists specific projects to receive funding, Frank said.

“This is just the start of the fun,” she said.

Frank held two meetings last Wednesday to share information about requirements for projects to be eligible for inclusion om the second-phase application.

She said the meetings were well attended by leaders of various public and private organizations, including Tuolumne Utilities District, Groveland Community Services District, Groveland Community Services District, Twain harte Community Services District, Cal Fire, Sierra Pacific Industries, Pacific-Ultrapower and more.

More information will be posted in the coming weeks about public meetings to gather further input and project ideas.

“We’ll continue to update the website as we get information from the state and continue to refine that,” she said.  “As we get more information, we’ll get that out to the public and continue to have discussions as far as our unmet needs and what we need to build a more resilient community in Tuolumne County.”

 

 

 

Read More

Rim Fire reforestation workshop set

By Guy McCarthy

The Union Democrat, June 17, 2015

     Rim Fire recovery staff with the Stanislaus National Forest plan to host a workshop July 8 to review potential alternatives for reforestation in parts of the federally managed forest that were scorched, burned or denuded by the gigantic blaze between August and October 2013.

The Rim Fire burned a total of 257,314 acres – more than 400 square miles – including 154,530 acres in the Stanislaus national Forest, and 77,252 acres in Yosemite national park, according to federal land managers.

More than 80 percent of the Stanislaus Forest did not burn in the Rim Fire, according to the Forest Service.  Unburned portions of the forest remain vulnerable to bark beetle infestation, tree mortality, drought and competition for scarce water.

The July 8 workshop is a step in a process the Forest Service must work through with individuals, groups and other members of the public, as well as interested parties known as stakeholders, before the federal agency can move forward with reforestation plan specifics.

“Sixty-five comments were received during our 45-day scoping period which ended on April 13, “Stanislaus National Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins said in an announcement.

“Now our goal is to provide the community an opportunity to review the draft alternatives that were developed to address the concerns that were raised,” Higgins said.  “These alternatives will be analyzed in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement, which is expected to be available for review in the fall.”

Higgins emphasized that she and Rim Fire recovery staff with the Stanislaus National Forest urge people to stay engaged in the decision-making process.

“If you who have an interest in how the landscapes burned by the Rim Fire are restored, it’s important for you to attend,” Higgins said.

Stanislaus national forest staff summarized their reasons for initiating the reforestation project and the project’s primary goals:

  • Return a mixed conifer forest to 30,065 acres.
  • Restore old forest for wildlife habitat and connectivity.
  • Reduce hazardous fuels for future fire resiliency.
  • Eradicate noxious weeds.

Forest Service staff are also keen on avoiding another giant fire in the 898,099-acre Stanislaus national Forest.  The 2013 Rim Fire was the largest in Sierra Nevada records and the third-largest in California history.

The reforestation workshop is open to anyone who wants to attend.  It is scheduled 9 a.m. to 3 p.m. July 8 at 19777 Greenley Road, Sonora.  Participants should RSBP gdempsey@fs.fed.us by July 1.

 

 

 

Read More

Legal challenge to logging shot down

By Guy McCarthy

The Union Democrat, May 27, 2015

The Forest Service can continue to allow logging of trees burned during the 2013 Rim Fire despite a legal challenge led by out-of-county environmentalists, who argue that cutting down fire-damaged trees threatens spotted owls living in and near the burn area.

A decision by U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth District, judges filed Tuesday in San Francisco stalls the legal action for now.  People with the plaintiffs – the Center for Biological Diversity, the Earth Island Institute, and the California Chaparral Institute – can take their appeal higher if they want to.

“It’s an unfortunate decision from our perspective,” said Justin Augustine of the Center for Biological Diversity.  “We are still considering what we will do next.”

The plaintiffs’ options include appealing the case to the Supreme Court.

“In terms of appeals, we are at the end of the line,” Augustine said.  “We can ask the Supreme Court to hear our case, but the court can decide not to.”

Multiple Rim Fire recovery stakeholders, including Tuolumne County counsel, the American Forest Resource Council, Sierra Pacific Industries, and Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, have allied with the Forest Service to oppose the legal action.

A total of 7,410 acres in the Rim Fire burn in the Stanislaus National Forest have been logged to date, said Barbara Drake, director of the forest’s Rim Fire recovery team.

“It never stopped,” Drake said.  “We only got wintered out for a couple of days.  We stopped for a couple of days because the roads were wet at one point earlier this year.”

Logging in the forest’s rim Fire burn area continued Tuesday and is expected to continue through Oct. 31, 2016, Drake said.  The Forest Service has approval to log more than 17,300 acres of the burn inside Stanislaus forest boundaries, Drake said.

The plaintiffs’ legal challenges started in September 2014, Drake said.

“Obviously we are pleased the court ruled in our favor,” Drake said.  “The plaintiffs just wanted a preliminary injunction until their case can be heard.  At this rate, the work could be done before their case can be heard.”

Judges with the Ninth Circuit in their four-page decision filed Tuesday listed several reasons for siding with the Forest Service.

  • “Plaintiffs have not established a likelihood of success on the merits of their claims under the National Environmental Policy Act,” the judges wrote.
  • “The Environmental Impact statement and Record of Decision adequately incorporated the 2014 owl occupancy survey results by explaining that the Forest Service had re-established six protect activity centers where the surveys detected owl presence,” the judges wrote.
  • “The Forest Service also adequately addressed the scientific literature on owl occupancy in post-fire, high-severity burn habitat,” the judges wrote.

John Buckley with the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center applauded the federal court’s decision.

“CSERC sided with the Forest Service and Industry groups in support of the Rim Fire Salvage logging plan, because we believe that the Forest Service adequately considered logging impacts,” Buckley said.

“Our Center has worked to protect the California spotted owl and other at-risk wildlife species for more than two decades, so we clearly understand that important need,” Buckley said.  “But leaving vast areas in the Rim Fire blanketed with dead trees would create an enormous smount of woody fuel that could result in another devastating wildfire.”

The Forest service plan keeps logging out of known, core spotted owl habitat areas, and allows salvage logging in surrounding areas, a fair middle ground between wood production and wildlife protection, Buckley said.

“I am glad that the Ninth Circuit court affirmed the Forest Service logging plan,” Buckley said.

The Rim Fire burned more than 400 square miles, including portions of the Stanislaus National Forest and Yosemite National park, between August and October 2013.  According to the Forest Service, more than 80 percent of the Stanislaus Forest did not burn and remains vulnerable to bark beetle infestation, tree mortality, drought and competition for scarce water.

Read More

Biomass power plants seek support from state

By Alex MacLean

The Union Democrat, May 23, 2015

County leaders say proposed bill would be a win-win for environment and economy

     Biomass is one of California’s oldest renewable energy sources and a cleaner alternative to fossil fuels.

However, industry leaders say many of the state’s 33 biomass plants – including the Pacific Ultrapower facility in Chinese Camp – are at risk of closing in the next few years because they’re struggling to stay economically competitive with other subsidized forms of renewable energy, such as solar and wind.

“Most biomass plants in the state began operating 25 to 30 years ago,” Rick Spurlock, southern region general manager for the Orange County-based IHI Power Services corporation, which operates the Chinese Camp plant.  “We’re looking at losing up to half in the next three years.”

The Pacific Ultrapower biomass-energy plant has operated since 1986.  It employs 24 people and generates enough electricity per hour to serve 18,000 homes through the burning of woody waste, such as tree trimmings and undergrowth cleared from forests.

Proponent say biomass energy production serves multiple environmental and public benefits beyond producing power by diverting wood material from landfills, reducing the need for open burning of forest and agricultural wood and promoting the reduction of flammable vegetation in forests that can lead to large, environmentally harmful wildfires.

“We like to say we were renewable before renewable was cool,” Spurlock said.

A bipartisan bill, co-authored by Assemblyman Brian Dahle, R-Bieber, and Assemblyman Rudy Salas, D-Bakersfield, aims to provide support for California’s declining biomass industry by sharing fuel costs with a fund comprised of cap-and-trade revenues that’s intended for projects and initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The bill, AB 590, is scheduled to to be considered next week by the Assembly Appropriations Committee.  If approved, it would go to the Assembly floor for a vote sometime in the first week of June.

According to the bill’s sponsors, the goal is to “provide monthly incentives to maintain the current level of biomass power generation in the state and revitalize idle facilities in strategically located regions.”

At Tuesday’s meeting, the Tuolumne County Board of Supervisors unanimously supported the legislation.

“It is important to recognize they (biomass plants) don’t compete financially, predominantly with the natural gas industry,” said District 1 Supervisor Sherri Brennan, who is chairwoman of the county Natural Resources Committee.  “This is important to keeping these here and recognizing the benefits to air quality.”

Electricity generated by the Pacific Ultrapower plant is sold to PG&E under a 30-year contract that expires in 2016.  Spurrlock said the hope is that the subsides will reduce the cost of electricity and help them land another contract.

Sierra Pacific Industries also generates electricity to power its Standard sawmill using sawdust and other logging byproducts.

According to the California Biomass EWnergy Alliance, biomass plants cut emissions of “criteria pollutant” – such as carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide and particulate matter – by 98 percent compared to open burning.

There could be as much as 2 million tons of flammable biomass sitting on the floor of the 900,000-acre Stanislaus National Forest, said Dave Horak, forest timber management officer.

Horak said the U.S. Forest Service removes about 70,000 tons annually that are transported to biomass energy plants.  That doesn’t include the amount of biomass burned in piles and chopped up for use as soil cover to prevent erosion, but those numbers were not readily available.

Up to 300,000 tons would need to be removed each year from the Stanislaus national Forest to keep up with the annual growth, Horak estimated.

California generates about 25 million tons of organic waste annually, with about 8 million composed, nearly 2 million used for fuel and 15 million dumped in landfills.  Dumping in landfills is not the preferred method, because the material generates harmful methane as it decomposes.

Factors limiting the amount of biomass that can be removed or pile-burned in the forest include industry capacity, burn days and safety issues, according to Horak.  He said having the Chinese Camp energy plant nearby “benefits the forest tremendously.”

“The Stanislaus has been one of the leaders in biomass since (the plant’s) opening in 1986,” he said of the facility.  “We would rather use our resources to do prescribed burning and reintroduce fires into the forest as opposed to burn piles that could otherwise be removed.”

The 2013 Rim Fire burned 257,000 acres in the Central Sierra, including 154,000 in the Stanislaus National Forest.

Horak estimated the fire and subsequent logging of burned timber has generated approximately 700,000 tons of biomass that needs to be removed to reduce the risk for future catastrophic fires in the same area.  Approximately 100,000tons have been piled on roadsides for removal contracts, with 22,000 awarded for contract to date.

Energy initiatives pushed by President Barack Obama and the Environmental protection Agency promote biomass and biofuels – in addition to solar, wind and geothermal – as viable means of weaning the U.S. from its dependency on oil and other fossil fuels.

Not everyone is on the same page when it comes to using biomass for generating electricity, however.

The center for Biological Diversity, a Tucson-based environmental advocacy organization, has expressed opposition to the pending legislation in the state Legislature that would subsidize fuel costs for California biomass plants.

In a formal letter of opposition, the center described biomass energy production as “a technology that has proven to be inordinately inefficient and expensive, results in negative air quality impacts, and which provides highly questionable benefits to the climate.”

Brian Nowicki, the center’s California climate policy director, who works in Sacramento, said the center is against diverting money earmarked for reducing greenhouse gas emissions toward the wood-burning power plants.

“It’s trying to take money intended for meaningful greenhouse gas reductions and direct it to some of the most inefficient outcomes,” he said.

Meanwhile, other environmental organizations have come out in support of the legislation.

The Sierra Forest Legacy, a Garden Valley-based nonprofit organization that promotes the protection of ecosystems in the Sierra Nevada, is supportive of “appropriately scaled biomass facilities in forest communities,” said Craig Thomas, the group’s conservation director.

John Buckley, of the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte, said there’s “no way to overbuild” biomass facilities in the local area with the “huge gut” of biomass material in the forest that needs to be reduced.

“Our center would like to see SPI crate a big plant and the Chinese Camp plant take more from the forest,” he said.  “We believe there’s a huge need to get more of the slash wood and stuff out of the forest.”
 

 

Read More

Logging challenge returns to court

By Guy McCarthy

The Union Democrat, May 8, 2015

      A contentious lawsuit that has the Forest Service, Tuolumne County, loggers and other Rim Fire recovery stakeholders united against a challenge from environmental groups is expected to resurface Monday in San Francisco federal court.

Environmentalists, including the Center for biological Diversity, want to stop logging to remove trees burned during the 2013 Rim Fire because they claim California spotted owls live in and near burned areas in the Stanislaus National forest where logging is underway.

California spotted owls are not listed as threatened or endangered by the Forest Service or National Park Service, but the state Department of Fish and Wildlife considers them a “species of special concern.”

Tuolumne County officials and others have staunchly opposed legal actions against the salvage logging project since the Center for Biological Diversity, Earth Island Institute and California Chaparral Institute jointly filed their lawsuit in September.

“The county, along with several other groups, the American Forest Resource Council, Sierra Pacific Industries, Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions, the crook family and several other groups, have joined together to support the Forest Service and the Rim Fire recovery project,” Tuolumne County Counsel Sarah Carrillo said this week.

In November, federal District Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr. denied a third consecutive request from environmentalists to delay the salvage logging project.

“We are trying to get an injunction in place to prevent logging of spotted owl habitat,” Oakland-based Justin Augustine of the Center for Biological Diversity said this week.  “There is logging of this habitat ongoing at this point.  What was authorized by the Forest Service in their environmental impact statement was about 15,000 acres of spotted owl habitat.”

“We are in court because, from our perspective, the forest Service is not acknowledging they are going to be logging spotted owl habitat,” Augustine said.  “We know that is going to occur, but the Forest Service has not acknowledged that.”

Carrillo, who plans to argue otherwise in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco on Monday, refuted Augustine’s claims.

“That‘s their point of view,” Carrillo said.  “We believe the Forest Service did adequate analysis, and the project should be allowed to go forward.”

Outside environmental groups can’t break the strong local consensus supporting Rim Fire salvage logging, said Shaun Crook, president of the Tuolumne County Farm Bureau.

“My family has property up there known as the Myers Ranch,” Crook said.  “They lost a cabin, and 400 acres of timber, and around a hundred cattle in the Rim Fire.  To me, what is unfortunate is these outside groups who do not live here, they feel the need to file these lawsuits.

“I have to give the Forest Service credit moving at light speed to get that timber sold for salvage logging,” Crook said.  “The only people making money on this is lawyers.  I hope if these lose, the Center for Biological Diversity will be on the hook for the attorney fees.  People around here, including local environmentalists, are in favor of the salvage logging.”

The Rim Fire burned more than 400 square-miles, including portions of the Stanislaus National forest and Yosemite National Park, between August and October 2013.  More than 80 percent of the Stanislaus Forest did not burn and remains vulnerable to bark beetle infestation, tree mortality, drought and competition for scarce water, according to the Forest Service.

 

 

Read More

GOVERNMENT MOVES TO DISMISS RIM FIRE INDICTMENT

Sent: Friday, May 01, 2015 9:16 AM

Office of the United States Attorney

Eastern District of California

United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

Friday, May 01, 2015

www.justice.gov/usao/cae

Docket #: 1:14-cr-165 AWI

CONTACT: LAUREN HORWOOD

PHONE: 916-554-2706

usacae.edcapress@usdoj.gov

GOVERNMENT MOVES TO DISMISS RIM FIRE INDICTMENT

FRESNO, Calif. — The government has moved to dismiss the federal indictment against Keith Matthew Emerald, 33, of Columbia, California, United States Attorney Benjamin B. Wagner announced. The indictment alleged that Emerald had caused the Rim Fire, which burned approximately 250,000 acres of land, and that he had made a false statement to federal investigators regarding the origin of that fire.

In its motion to dismiss, filed today, the government advised the United States District Court that two witnesses had unexpectedly died in recent months, since the filing of the indictment last August. The government’s motion characterized one witness as critical to the case and stated that he had been expected to provide trial testimony regarding his discussions with Emerald shortly after Emerald had been rescued from the vicinity of the Rim Fire’s origin. That witness died in a workplace accident in February. The second witness was the helicopter pilot who first responded to the Rim Fire. That witness had been expected to testify about the initial response to the Rim Fire and the rescue of the defendant very close to the Rim Fire’s point of origin. That witness died in March of cardiac arrest. These witnesses’ prior statements are inadmissible hearsay and cannot be used as evidence at trial.

In its motion, the government stated that it had reassessed the case in light of the loss of this anticipated trial testimony and determined that without that testimony it was unlikely to prove the charges in the case beyond a reasonable doubt to the unanimous satisfaction of a trial jury. Accordingly, it was in the interests of justice to dismiss the case.

United States Attorney Wagner stated, “I appreciate the hard work done by the US Forest Service in investigating this case, and I understand that the government’s motion to dismiss will be frustrating to some. However, when circumstances change after indictment, and our judgment is that a case is no longer likely to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, it is our obligation to the defendant and to the Court to dismiss that case.”

The United States Attorney also noted that the indictment contained only allegations; a defendant is always presumed innocent until and unless proven guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.

 

 

 

Read More

Forest restoration proposed

John Holland The Modesto Bee-March10, 2015

 Tree Planting Planned on Fire-Scarred Land

SONORA – The Stanislaus National Forest proposed to replant conifers on 30,065 of the acres burned by the massive Rim Fire of 2013.

The plan, which involves about 12 percent of the total burned acreage, has drawn initial support from timber industry and environmental leaders.

“We applaud the Forest Service for putting together a reforestation program that looks like it’s going to meet the needs of the forest, : said Mike Albrecht, owner of a Jamestown-based company that does logging and other work in the woods.  “But it’s unfortunate that it takes so long to get the reforestation plan together.”

The U.S. Forest Service has launched the first round of public comment on the proposal.  A refined plan could be released for comment in late fall, leading to a possible decision by Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins in 2016.  Planting could start in 2017, after seedlings are available from the Placerville nursery, and would take three to five years to complete, team leader Maria Benech said.

The plan does not cover private timberland within the burn area, which is being replanted by its owners.  It also does not involve land in Yosemite National Park, where recovery is being left to natural forces.

Even in the national forest, most of the charred land would not be planted.  Some of it is brush rather than timberland.  Some is too steep to plant.   And much of the fire zone had light to moderate damage, so regrowth can happen naturally via seed cones dropped by surviving trees.

The fire started Aug. 17, 2013, near the confluence of the Tuolumne and Clavey Rivers and eventually burned 257,314 acres.  IT is the largest blaze on record in the Sierra Nevada and the third largest in state history.  Keith Matthew Emeral of Columbia faces federal charges of starting the illegal campfire that is suspected to be the cause.

Environmental leader John Buckley said he has concerns about the reforestation plan, including herbicide spraying to kill competing vegetation, but agrees on the overall need to replant.

“Some forest stands were so incinerated by high-severity flames that no trees survived and few, if any, cones escaped to provide seeds to get new young trees growing,” he said.

Buckley is executive director of the Central Sierra environmental resource Center, based in Twain Harte.  He and Albrecht are co-chairmen of Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions, a coalition that includes conservation groups, the timber industry and other partners.

They said the coalition will work to achieve a final reforestation plan that balances all the needs.   It did the same last year with the plan for salvage logging of some of the fire-killed trees, which is providing raw material to lumber mills.

Buckley questions the proposed planting density of 200-300 seedlings per acre.  This might make sense for lumber production, he said, but it could result in a forest thick with wildfire fuels.

Benech said the density would vary across the terrain, with fewer tees on fire-prone ridgetops and more in moister soil near streams.  The planting would be in clumps, as opposed to the rows in past plantations.

The seedlings would be genetically suited to the elevation and other conditions at each planting site.  They would take several decades to grow to a size for logging, and even longer in areas managed to mimic old-growth wildlife habitat.

Small parts of the fire area would be managed for deer, with an emphasis on oaks over conifers.  The plan also involves thinning conifer plantations that survived the Rim Fire and using herbicides on “noxious” weeds that have invaded some areas.

Sierra Pacific Industries, by far the largest landowner in the fire area, will replant about 11,500 acres this year and next, said Mark Pawlicki, director of corporate affairs and sustainability.  Two of the Redding-based company’s sawmills are in Tuolumne County.

SPI has completed salvage logging on its land, which made way for the planting crews.

“Our goal is to get the area replanting as soon as we can, get the forest started for the future,” Pawlicki said.

 

Read More

Input sought on proposed Rim Fire reforestation plan

Guy McCarthy

The Union Democrat – March 2, 2015 

A proposal to replant and thin about 42,000 acres on the Stanislaus National Forest impacted by the 2013 Rim Fire is available online, and a 45-day period has begun for people to submit written comments to the Forest Service.

The deadline to submit comments is 11:50 p.m. Monday, April 13.

The proposal and comment period are steps in a process that will include a Draft Environmental Impact Statement.  The earliest the first trees in the reforestation proposed action can be planted will be spring 2017, said Georgia Dempsey of the forest’s Rim Fire Recovery Team.

By that time, more than three years will have passed since the giant forest fire blew up east of Sonora.  Between August, 2013 and October 2013, the Rim Fire burned 257,314 acres, including 154,530 acres in the Stanislaus National Forest and 77,254 acres in Yosemite National Park.

Salvage logging in the burn area had to happen first, and work on the proposed action for reforestation began in late October 2014, Dempsey said.

When the public comment period closes in April, a team of Forest Service resource specialists and scientists will review the comments to see if there’s anything they can include in the draft EIS, Dempsey said.  They hope to have the draft ready by late this year.

Multiple private groups and government agencies will take note of the proposed reforestation plan, including Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions.  The YSS coalition has more than 30 member groups representing timber, bioenergy, mining, construction, utilities, water, agriculture, recreation, tourism, American Indian tribes, environmentalists and other interests.

“The YSS collaborative group has been eager for the Forest Service to move reforestation forward in the Rim Fire, so we are glad to see the release of a proposed plan,” said John Buckley, a co-chairman of Yosemite-Stanislaus Solutions.

“YSS looks forward to studying the details of what the agency is promoting and then submitting suggestions that may help avoid controversy and produce a final plan that has broad support,” Buckley said.  “Clearly there is a strong need for reforestation and a wide range of other restoration treatments in damaged portions of the burn area.”

The proposed reforestation plan includes possible usage of the herbicide glyphosate, Dempsey said.  Glyphosate is similar to a commercial herbicide sold at hardware stores.

“It does mention glyphosate, to help keep back competitive brush in replant areas, to allow tree seedlings to compete with the brush,” Dempsey said.  “It’s really similar to Roundup, which a lot of folks use in their backyards.  Forest Service and federal Fish and Wildlife scientists are looking at potential impacts from glyphosate.”

The Rim Fire Reforestation proposal and related documents can be found online at www.fs.usda.gov/project/?project=45612.The proposal includes “reforestation, plantation thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement and noxious weed treatments on National forest System lands within the footprint of the Rim Fire,” Stanislaus national Forest officials said.

Forest Supervisor Jeanne Higgins urges people to review the proposal and share thoughts in writing.

“Written comments on the proposal are encouraged,” Higgins said.  “Knowing your thoughts, concerns and issues early on in the process is important to us.  To formally have your voice heard, it is necessary to send in your written comments during the open comment period.  Please include supporting reasons for your suggestions to help us better understand your perspective.”

Written comments can be submitted to:  Stanislaus national Forest, Attn:  Rim Reforestation, 1977 Greenley Road, Sonora, CA 95370.  Comments can be submitted by fax at 533-1890.  Comments can also be emailed with “Rim Reforestation” in the subject line to:  comments-pacificsouthwest-stanislaus@fs.fed.us.

Names of commenters will become part of the public record, according to the Forest Service.  For more information, contact Rim Reforestation Team Leader Maria Benech at 532-3671, ext. 463.

 

 

Read More

John Buckley: When it comes to natural resource issues, give peace a chance

Letter to the Editor submitted to The Modesto Bee published 02/27/2015

Despite far below average snow in the mountains, many residents of the Central Valley may not fully grasp that California continues to be in the midst of a prolonged drought. But unless significant snowfall comes over the next two months, agriculture and other major water users will continue to face restricted water availability and citizens will be directed to make extra efforts to conserve water. The challenge is real and severe.

In the midst of the prolonged drought, it can be easy for one interest group or another to rip into those who represent competing demands or to castigate those with differing political priorities. As one example, a recent community column in The Bee featured strident views by a West Side grower (“State’s water troubles man-made,” Feb. 22, Page D1) who condemned Pope Francis, churches and schools for encouraging people to care about the environment when, from his perspective, it is business and agriculture that really matter. He lambasted environmentalists as earth worshippers and pagans.

Congress provides another embarrassing example of such polarizing outbursts that further divide politicians and their constituencies instead of bringing legislators and competing interests together to resolve common challenges.

In direct contrast to such high-profile polarization, there are current examples of diverse interests putting aside differences to actually cooperate to solve problems. In the Stanislaus National Forest, one forest landscape collaborative process with a broad range of interests has already gained approval for millions of dollars in extra funds to apply to logging for thinning, prescribed burns, road reconstruction and other needed forest treatments in the Mokelumne River watershed.

A second collaborative with even more diverse participation is the Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions group. With timber industry, environmental, business, agency, tribal, ranching and recreation interests all collaborating, YSS has already gained major grants and is making progress in gaining millions of additional dollars to be directly applied to restoring the Rim fire landscape and reducing watershed damage.

Along with these two efforts, a third collaborative group has focused more narrowly on water and watershed issues across the upper watersheds of the Tuolumne and Stanislaus rivers. Environmentalists, local politicians, tribal representatives, water agencies and other interests have met monthly for more than seven years to focus on areas where we can find consensus – not where we disagree. As a result of showing respect for opposing views and working to find agreement, the Tuolumne-Stanislaus Integrated Regional Water Management group has successfully gained millions of dollars in state bond funds to benefit water districts and watershed management in the local region.

As is often evident on certain news stations, at political meetings or in columns, it can be easy to take potshots at those with different views or those who hold different priorities. But when the goal is to identify common interests and find ways to achieve them, opponents aren’t seen as the enemy but as potential partners.

As a longtime environmental leader dealing with a wide range of controversial issues across this vast region, it is my experience that respectful strategies and sensitivity to opposing views gain far more in the long run than denigrating opponents as evils to be overcome.

Congress in particular might want to give it a try. John Buckley is executive director of the Central Sierra Environmental Resource Center of Twain Harte

Read More

County vies for Rim Fire recovery funding

Excerpt from the article by Guy McCarthy

The county has been chosen as California’s sole candidate in a nationwide disaster resilience competition.  Tuolumne County’s final application, with backing from Gov. Jerry Brown, could win a badly needed cash infusion to improve forest management, promote healthier watersheds and prevent more giant forest fires in the Mother Lode. Competition organizers intend to promote risk assessment and planning, and they hope to fund “innovative resilience projects” to better prepare communities for future extreme events.

“Here in Tuolumne County, we are most assuredly fully eligible due to the magnitude of the Rim Fire and its economic consequences,” said John Buckley of the central Sierra Environmental Resource Center in Twain Harte.  “The completion, however, will judge whether the application put together by state staff and county interests ends up being compelling and convincing. “

Member of the county’s water policy advisory committee discussed the potential to bring additional millions in funding to Rim Fire recovery efforts on Thursday, and people with the Yosemite Stanislaus Solutions group met Friday to talk strategy.

For the complete article see the Union Democrat, January 26, 2015 Edition

Read More